Advertising research for practitioners

New peer-reviewed advertising research, explained in plain English: what works in digital ads, how to apply it and what results to expect.

Marketing in 3 · Topic

13 issues of Marketing in 3 on Advertising, newest first. Each one explains a new peer-reviewed study in plain English, with steps to apply it.

Issue 26 · Week of

The brand walks. The influencer burns.

In the Ferragni and Balocco case, 96% of journalists' tweets were about the influencer. Consumers followed the press, and the brand barely got mentioned.

Issue 20 · Week of

Write the post for them and they will send it

Handing customers a ready-made post lifted sharing from 0.4% to 2.1% in a real gym campaign, and quietly stopped unhappy customers posting at all. How to use it, and where it gets uncomfortable.

Issue 13 · Week of

Match ads to pages by look, not just by topic

Placing ads by both look and topic of the page lifted predicted attention by up to 10%; matching by category or text alone did not. Evidence from 3,531 ads.

Issue 9 · Week of

Test your ads in the feed, not on a slide

The same airline ad scored lower (4.31 vs 4.82 out of 7) when placed among flood posts. How to pretest social ads in a realistic feed, for free.

Issue 3 · Week of

When brand memes sell, and when they flop

In a field test, a meme ad doubled click-through (1.40% against 0.65%) and raised ROAS from 1.14 to 1.52. Memes work only when mature and for mainstream products.

Issue 1 · Week of

Generative AI images that actually engage

Fine-tuned on top-rated ads, generative AI made ad images that beat conventional ads in pretests and lifted Meta click-through by 49%. How to apply it, and when it fails.